The International Metalworkers Federation
(IMF) organises in the steel, shipbuilding, automobile, aerospace and electronics
industries. Workers in these industries have experienced the negative effects of
globalisation. At its Congress in May 1997, the IMF adopted a new Action Programme which
responds to globalisation and makes recommendations for action. How does the IMF view the
role of workers education in the context of globalisation? In this interview, the
IMFs Education Officer, David Seligson, gives some ideas.
At IFWEAs last Congress, delegates prioritised education work on
globalisation. What is your perspective on how IFWEA should address globalisation?
Globalisation has advanced so rapidly that people are often not capable
of grasping the profound changes which have taken place. This is a major threat to
democracy and the well-being of the worlds majority. In its education programmes,
IFWEA should emphasise the interdependency prevailing today between nations and economies.
Being an international organisation devoted to workers education, IFWEA could bring
globalisation to the different curricula of its affiliates which would also then
strengthen links between them.
How has the globalisation of your industry changed the IMFs
approach to education?
Globalisation has awakened the IMF to realise the utmost importance of
education in the work of all our affiliates, whether they are from the industrialised
countries or from the developing world. As our industries are heavily controlled by
transnational companies, our affiliates have to understand the international character and
operations of these companies. This is necessary if we want to exert influence in these
companies.
How are IMF education programmes concretely addressing issues
concerning globalisation?
The IMFs new Action Programme devotes a sizeable part to
globalisation. The Programme is used as education materials and is being translated into
many languages. The education programmes run by our regional offices and our affiliates
also tackle the problems of globalisation.
IFWEA is running International Study Circles using new information
and communication technology. What is your view on how new technology can be used in trade
union education?
Having followed the IFWEA project, I think the approach offers some
interesting perspectives. However, there are also limitations. Only a minority of trade
unionists have access to these new technologies. This will change when the Internet
terminal becomes a household appliance. Technology is merely a tool to achieve a
particular goal. The underlying theories and practices in trade union education are more
important. Educating union members is very different from teaching children. This should
be borne in mind.
How can IFWEA support the education activities of the IMF?
The IMF has affiliates in nearly one hundred countries in five
continents. We are engaged in a common struggle for the benefit of workers. Education is a
tool in this struggle. Often though we lack professionalism in our training. This is
something that IFWEA could provide. Unfortunately, IFWEA now is too weak to provide any
real assistance. Hopefully, this is changing for the better.
Contact David Seligson at: IMF, 54 bis, route des
Acacias, Case Postale 1516, CH-1227, Geneva; +41-22-3085050 (phone); +41-22-3085055 (fax);
imf@iprolink.ch (e-mail).